The Complainant alleged that the City Council violated the OMA by discussing "CVS and legislation relating to it" without those items being properly noticed on the meeting agenda. We reviewed the record, including video of the meeting, and determined that the Council did not discuss business related to "CVS and legislation related to it," and that CVS was only briefly mentioned in passing as part of a larger discussion relating to an item that was noticed on the agenda. Accordingly, we found no violation.
