The Complainant alleged that the Board violated the OMA when an agenda item failed to sufficiently specify the nature of the business to be discussed and when meeting minutes failed to accurately describe what occurred at the meeting. Based on our review of the evidence, including the meeting audio, we found that the agenda item provided fair and adequate notice to the public. We also found that the meeting minutes contained all the elements required by the OMA and that they fairly described the Board's discussion. We found no violations.
