The Complainant alleged the School Committee violated the OMA on February 4, 2020 when it provided school tours to potential custodial vendors that constituted a rolling quorum pertaining to a new custodial contract. The undisputed evidence revealed that the February 4 "meeting" was a mandatory pre-bid meeting for potential vendors and no School Committee members were present. Without evidence that a quorum of the School Committee convened a meeting, the OMA is not implicated. Accordingly, we found no violation.
