The Complainant alleges the City violated the APRA by withholding two videotapes that she requested. This Office reviewed the evidence and viewed the videotapes in camera. We concluded that the videotapes depicted multiple minors and implicated privacy interests. We also concluded that no public interest had been identified that would outweigh the privacy interests implicated by disclosure of the videotapes, and that the undisputed evidence indicated that it was not possible to protect the privacy interests by redaction. Accordingly, we determined that the City did not violate the APRA.
